Let me be honest with you—when I first heard about the Columbian Dyip’s renewed focus on local player development, I was skeptical. In a league where imports often dominate both the stat sheet and the spotlight, it’s easy to overlook the quiet, steady growth happening behind the scenes. But then I came across that telling quote from one of their players: “The goal really for us is not to rely too much on [import] Nastiya. It should really be us locals, because this is for the long term. Coach always says it’s long-term, and we should learn from Nastiya.” That single statement, more than any win-loss record, reveals the soul of this team’s rebuilding project. It’s not just about surviving the PBA season—it’s about building something sustainable, something that lasts beyond a single conference or a standout import performance.
I’ve followed the PBA long enough to recognize when a team is planting seeds rather than just chasing quick wins. Columbian Dyip, formerly known as Kia, has often been tagged as a “work in progress,” but this season, there’s a tangible shift in their approach. They’re not just filling roster spots; they’re investing in player growth, particularly among their local core. Take CJ Perez, for example—since being drafted first overall in 2019, he’s evolved from a high-scoring rookie into a more complete player. Last conference, he averaged around 22 points, 7 rebounds, and 3.5 assists per game. Those aren’t just empty stats; they reflect his increasing responsibility as the team’s primary option. But what impresses me more is how the team is balancing his explosive talent with the development of others like Rashawn McCarthy and JP Calvo. McCarthy, in particular, has stepped up as a vocal leader, often directing plays and anchoring the defense when the game gets tight.
Now, let’s talk strategy. Coach Johnedel Cardel has been emphasizing a system where the import—currently, the highly skilled Nastiya—serves as a mentor rather than a crutch. That’s a brave move in a league where imports often account for 40-50% of a team’s total output. Instead of running every play through their foreign reinforcement, the Dyip are deliberately creating situations where locals take charge in crucial moments. I remember watching one of their recent games where, despite Nastiya’s 28-point performance, it was Perez and McCarthy who closed out the fourth quarter. That kind of trust doesn’t develop overnight. It’s built through repetition, through trial and error, and frankly, through losses that teach more than wins. Last season, they finished near the bottom with a 4-7 record in the elimination round, but if you look closely, you’ll notice their point differential improved significantly compared to previous years. They’re losing differently—by smaller margins, with more fight, and with clear lessons to carry forward.
What really stands out to me is their commitment to player-driven accountability. In my conversations with people close to the team, I’ve learned that players regularly hold film sessions without the coaching staff, breaking down their own mistakes and discussing adjustments. That level of ownership is rare, especially in a setup where imports often command the locker room. By treating Nastiya as a learning resource rather than a savior, the Dyip are fostering a culture where locals grow not just as athletes, but as students of the game. I’ve always believed that sustainable success in the PBA comes from a strong local foundation—just look at teams like San Miguel or Ginebra. Their dynasties weren’t built on imports alone; they were built on homegrown talent that matured together over seasons.
Of course, there are challenges. The Dyip’s defense still needs work—they allowed an average of 102 points per game last conference, which is simply too high if they want to compete against elite squads. Their half-court execution can be inconsistent, and at times, they rely too heavily on transition opportunities. But here’s the thing: I’d rather see a team with identifiable flaws that they’re actively addressing than a team masking weaknesses with short-term fixes. The fact that they’re prioritizing long-term growth, even at the cost of immediate wins, tells me they’re on the right track. It might take another season or two, but mark my words—this group has the potential to surprise a lot of people.
In conclusion, the Columbian Dyip’s journey is a refreshing departure from the typical PBA narrative. They’re not just playing for today; they’re building for tomorrow. By empowering their local players and leveraging their import as a mentor, they’re creating a foundation that could eventually transform them from underdogs into contenders. As a longtime observer of the league, I find their approach not just smart, but necessary. The PBA needs more teams thinking beyond the next game, and in that sense, the Dyip aren’t just rebuilding a roster—they’re redefining what it means to grow in a competitive landscape.
